Niedas-Aguilar v. Mahan et al
Manuel Niedas-Aguilar |
Cynthia Mahan and WEL Companies, Inc. |
4:2024cv01118 |
August 14, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Rodney H Holmes |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Manuel Niedas-Aguilar. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Moffitt, John) |
Filing 14 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiff Manuel Niedas-Aguilar. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (JEB) |
Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cynthia Mahan. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses by Cynthia Mahan.(Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Kevin L. Fritz for Defendant Cynthia Mahan. (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Cynthia Mahan Cynthia Mahan waiver signed on 8/14/2024, answer due 10/15/2024. (Wells, Alexandra) |
Filing 9 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
Filing 8 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Manuel Niedas-Aguilar.(JWD) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Petition by WEL Companies, Inc..(Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant WEL Companies, Inc.. (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by WEL Companies, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant WEL Companies, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Kevin L. Fritz for Defendant WEL Companies, Inc.. (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Alexandra Carolyn Wells for Defendant WEL Companies, Inc.. (Wells, Alexandra) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis City Circuit Court, case number 2422-CC04061, with receipt number AMOEDC-10766088, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by WEL Companies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - All Docket Entries, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Fritz, Kevin) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.