Human v. Fisher Investments, Inc.
Daniel Human |
Fisher Investments, Inc. |
4:2024cv01177 |
August 28, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
John M Bodenhausen |
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
Filing 5 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Melanie G. Ng. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10793039) by Defendant Fisher Investments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Ng, Melanie) |
Filing 4 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Alexander Terepka. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10792986) by Defendant Fisher Investments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Terepka, Alexander) |
Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Daniel Human.(JBH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Fisher Investments, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(Guletz, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 24SL-CC03265, with receipt number AMOEDC-10792542, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Fisher Investments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Docket and Pleadings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3 - Original Filing Form)(Guletz, Matthew) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Human v. Fisher Investments, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fisher Investments, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Melanie Ng |
Represented By: | Matthew D. Guletz |
Represented By: | Alexander Donald Terepka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Human | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.