Williams v. Picker
Plaintiff: Sherrell Williams
Defendant: Tobias Picker
Case Number: 4:2024cv01539
Filed: November 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Dueker
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall be given up to and including January 17, 2025, to file a notice of dismissal, a joint stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to comply timely with this order will result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Dismissal Paper(s) due by 1/17/2025.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker on 12/18/2024. (JMP)
December 18, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement by Tobias Picker (Adamek Moore, Jennine)
December 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER CONCERNING JURISDICTION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by December 18, 2024, Picker shall file an amended Notice of Removal that alleges facts establishing the citizenship of all parties to this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Picker does not timely and fully comply with this Order, this matter will be remanded due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 12/18/2024.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker on 12/11/24. (KJS)
December 10, 2024 Filing 13 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Sherrell Williams. . (Wilmowski, Thomas)
December 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: This matter is rescheduled for Rule 16 Conference on 12/17/2024 at 01:00 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker. TIME CHANGE ONLY. (Rule 16 Conference set for 12/17/2024 01:00 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker on 12/5/2024. (CLT)
November 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: Track 2: Standard Joint Scheduling Plan due by 12/10/2024. Rule 16 Conference set for 12/17/2024 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker on 11/25/24. (KJS)
November 22, 2024 Filing 10 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Sherrell Williams, Defendant Tobias Picker. (CLT)
November 18, 2024 Filing 9 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto)
November 18, 2024 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sherrell Williams. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Wilmowski, Thomas)
November 18, 2024 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas G. Wilmowski, Jr for Plaintiff Sherrell Williams. (Wilmowski, Thomas)
November 18, 2024 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tobias Picker. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Adamek Moore, Jennine)
November 18, 2024 Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Sherrell Williams.(JBH)
November 18, 2024 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Joseph S. Dueker. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH)
November 15, 2024 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by John G. Schultz for Defendant Tobias Picker. (Schultz, John)
November 15, 2024 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Tobias Picker.(Adamek Moore, Jennine)
November 15, 2024 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Jennine D. Adamek Moore for Defendant Tobias Picker. (Adamek Moore, Jennine)
November 15, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from City of St. Louis Circuit Court, case number 2422-CC11177, with receipt number AMOEDC-10940064, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Tobias Picker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #5 Exhibit Docket Entry and State Court File)(Adamek Moore, Jennine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Picker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherrell Williams
Represented By: Thomas G. Wilmowski, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tobias Picker
Represented By: John G. Schultz
Represented By: Jennine D. Adamek Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?