Jobe v. Medical Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Ruth L. Jobe
Defendant: Medical Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2007cv04152
Filed: August 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Jefferson City Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Nanette K. Laughrey
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Fort Dearborn's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 63] is DENIED, and Jobe's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 67] is GRANTED. (Kanies, Renea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jobe v. Medical Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruth L. Jobe
Represented By: Christopher M. Rohrer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medical Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Patricia A. Winchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?