Sullivan v. Harris et al
| John J Sullivan, Jr |
| Mark Grothoff, Jeff Harris and Arthur E Allen |
| 2:2019cv04039 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) and (2) for the reasons stated herein. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a form (28 U.S.C. 2254) that he may use to file a habeas corpus case if he wishes to challenge the validity of his confinement. Further, the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid. Finally, Plaintiff is warned that, in addition to the $350.00 filing fee for this case, federal law "makes prisoners responsible for [appellate filing fees of $505.00 per case] the moment the prisoner... files an appeal." (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 9
ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) and (2) for the reasons stated herein. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a form (28 U.S.C. 2254) that he may use to file a habeas corpus case if he wishes to challenge the validity of his confinement. Further, the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid. Finally, Plaintiff is warned that, in addition to the $350.00 filing fee for this case, federal law "makes prisoners responsible for [appellate filing fees of $505.00 per case] the moment the prisoner... files an appeal." Signed on March 19, 2019 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (CLERK'S NOTE: 28 USC 2254 forms mailed to plaintiff with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO076385 in the amount of $10.50 issued to John J Sullivan, Jr. (Ellis, Lindsey) |
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT filed by John J Sullivan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. Signed on March 14, 2019, by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $10.50; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before March 20, 2019, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on March 6, 2019 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 5 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by John J Sullivan, Jr. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by John J Sullivan, Jr. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/12/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by John J Sullivan, Jr. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by John J Sullivan, Jr. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
