Purkey v. United States of America
Case Number: 4:2006cv08001
Filed: November 25, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
Presiding Judge: Fernando J. Gaitan
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER denying 107 Purkey's motion for certificate of appealability. Signed on 10/28/10 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER denying 91 movant's motion to alter judgment and granting movant's Motion to Withdraw 100 and movant's Pro Se Motion 99 is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 12/22/09. (Enss, Rhonda)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER DENYING movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct His Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 47 ; DENYING the Motion to Strike the Statement of Frederick A. Duchardt, Jr. 83 ; DENYING the Motion to Set Matter for an Evidentiary Hearing 84 ; and DENYING AS MOOT the Motion for Leave to File Late Response to Motion to Strike Statement of Frederick A. Duchardt Jr. 87 .Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 9/29/09. (Enss, Rhonda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Purkey v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?