Hallmark Cards, Incorporated v. Monitor Clipper Partners, LLC et al
Hallmark Cards, Incorporated |
Monitor Clipper Partners, LLC, Monitor Clipper Equity Partners, II, LP, Monitor Company Group Limited Parnership, Mark Pocharski, Robert Lurie, Adam Doctoroff, Steven Levin, Annica Blake and Robert Samuelson |
4:2008cv00840 |
November 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
Jackson |
Ortrie D. Smith |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 587 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Bill of Costs. Signed on 3/20/13 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Wolfe, Steve) |
Filing 384 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 337 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Colin Blaydon; granting in part and denying in part 338 Rich Hoffman; granting in part and denying in part 339 Frank O'Connell; granting in part and denying in part 342 Kenneth Serwin. Signed on 7/25/12 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Wolfe, Steve) |
Filing 149 ORDER and OPINION granting in part and denying in part 111 Defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed on 12/02/2010 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva) |
Filing 147 ORDER denying 108 special motion to dismiss. Signed on 11/22/2010 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.