Foley Company v. Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC
| Foley Company |
| Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC |
| Foley Company |
| Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC |
| HDR Engineering, Inc. |
| Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC |
| 4:2011cv01080 |
| October 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Robert E. Larsen |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
227
ORDER denying 133 Pedrotti's motion for summary judgment. Signed on 8/6/13 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
|
Filing
226
ORDER denying 135 M2T2's motion for summary judgment. Signed on 8/1/13 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 30 Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff M2T2's motion for leave to file sur-reply and denying 14 Third-Party Defendant HDR Engineering, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and finding as moot HDR's Motio n for More Definite Statement. M2T2's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims attached to its Suggestions in Opposition which provide a more definite statement is not deemed filed. M2T2 shall file the attachment as a separate document on or before March 23, 2012. Signed on 3/16/12 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
