Winn et al v. Bright Construction, Inc.
| Carpenters District Council of Kansas City Pension Fund, Keith Winn and Donald E Greenwell, III |
| Bright Construction, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv00181 |
| February 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Greg Kays |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER - (1) Petitioner's Motion to Vacate or Modify Arbitration Award Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1401(b)(2) (Doc. 1 in Case No. 12-9028) is GRANTED; (2) Respondent Melmore Construction, Inc., f/k/a DCM Construction, Inc.'s Motion to Confi rm Arbitration Award as to DCM Only and Suggestions in Support ( 23 in Case No. 12-9028) is GRANTED; and (3) Carpenters District Council of Kansas City Pension Fund's Suggestions in Support of Motion to Comfirm [sic] and Enforce Arbitration Awar d Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1401(b)(2) ( 25 in Case No. 12-9028) is DENIED. Bright and the Pension Fund are directed to reopen the arbitration proceedings to allow Bright the opportunity to have a full hearing on its defenses consistent with this Order. As both of the above-captioned actions have been dealt with in their entirety, they shall both be marked as closed. Signed on 5/5/14 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda) (Entered: 05/05/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
