Ideker v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Michelle K. Ideker
Defendant: PPG Industries, Inc., Rohm & Haas, Harley-Davidson, Inc., Harley-Davidson Motor Company Operations, Inc. and PPG Industries Ohio Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00248
Filed: March 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER AND OPINION (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (2)DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND (3) DETERMINING ORDER IS APPEALABLE PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b) entered by Judge Ortrie D. Smith (Matthes, Renea) Modified on 1/2/2014 to correct Judge's name (Matthes, Renea).
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER and OPINION denying 31 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 10/15/13 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Wolfe, Steve)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ideker v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle K. Ideker
Represented By: Kenneth B. McClain
Represented By: Michael S. Kilgore
Represented By: Daniel A. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PPG Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Erik L Hansell
Represented By: Bruce A. Moothart
Represented By: Carol A. Rutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rohm & Haas
Represented By: David R. Erickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Represented By: James Cirincione
Represented By: Kevin M. Kuhlman
Represented By: Trevor J. Will
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harley-Davidson Motor Company Operations, Inc.
Represented By: James Cirincione
Represented By: Kevin M. Kuhlman
Represented By: Trevor J. Will
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PPG Industries Ohio Inc.
Represented By: Erik L Hansell
Represented By: Bruce A. Moothart
Represented By: Carol A. Rutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?