Knox v. Mazuma Credit Union

Plaintiff: Levi Knox
Defendant: Mazuma Credit Union
Case Number: 4:2015cv00288
Filed: April 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Andrew
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D. Smith
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER AND OPINION REMANDING THIS CASE OR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Signed on 5/27/15 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knox v. Mazuma Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Levi Knox
Represented By: Mitchell L. Burgess
Represented By: Blake P. Green
Represented By: Ralph K. Phalen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mazuma Credit Union
Represented By: Zachary H. Hemenway
Represented By: J. Emmett Logan
Represented By: George Francis Verschelden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?