Ayers v. Prime Healthcare Services Kansas City, LLC et al
| Audra Ayers |
| Sherry McNary, Dan Brewster and Prime Healthcare Services Kansas City, LLC |
| 4:2018cv00749 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Audra Ayers. (Geary, Grant) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 #9 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Mark P Grajski and Geoffrey Westbrook for Dan Brewster, Sherry McNary, and Prime Healthcare Services Kansas City, LLC allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. ; This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Russel, Jeri)
|
| Filing 9 Motion to allow Geoffrey C. Westbrook to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-5997283) filed by Francis X. Neuner, Jr on behalf of All Defendants. (Neuner, Francis) |
| Filing 8 Motion to allow Mark P. Grajski to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-5997243) filed by Francis X. Neuner, Jr on behalf of Dan Brewster, Sherry McNary, Prime Healthcare Services Kansas City, LLC. (Neuner, Francis) |
| Filing 7 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 11/2/2018. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/16/2018. Signed on 10/2/18 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy) |
| Filing 6 Sherry McNary's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Sherry McNary.(Peterson, Brian) |
| Filing 5 Dan Brewster's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Dan Brewster.(Peterson, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Prime Healthcare Service's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Prime Healthcare Services Kansas City, LLC.(Peterson, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Francis X. Neuner, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Attorney Francis X. Neuner, Jr added to party Dan Brewster(pty:dft), Attorney Francis X. Neuner, Jr added to party Sherry McNary(pty:dft), Attorney Francis X. Neuner, Jr added to party Prime Healthcare Services Kansas City, LLC(pty:dft))(Neuner, Francis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County County, case number 1816-CV18322, filed by Brian E Peterson on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-5946916. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit PHS Return of Service, #3 Exhibit Brewster Return of Service, #4 Exhibit McNary Return of Service, #5 Exhibit Brewster Declaration, #6 Exhibit McNary Declaration, #7 Exhibit State Court File, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Peterson, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
