Creamer v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority
| Marjorie A Creamer and The Hush |
| Kansas City Area Transportation Authority and KCATA |
| 4:2019cv00021 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PRO SE AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kansas City Area Transportation Authority filed by Marjorie A Creamer.(Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 3
IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff is granted leave to file a proposed amended complaint on or before February 4, 2019 containing factual allegations sufficient to meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Failure to file an amended proposed complaint by the stated deadline may result in dismissal of Plaintiffs case without further notice. Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1) remains pending. Copy of order mailed to pro se plaintiff as directed in order. Signed on 1/15/19 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Baldwin, Joella)
|
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Marjorie A Creamer. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marjorie A Creamer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/22/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
