Smith et al v. Doe, M.D. et al
| Louis W. Smith |
| Swope Health Services, Jane Doe, M.D., John Doe, M.D. and HCA Midwest Health System |
| United States of America |
| 4:2019cv00197 |
| March 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION to dismiss party , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of Jane Doe, M.D., John Doe, M.D., Swope Health Services, United States of America. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/28/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Ray, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to substitute party filed by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of United States of America. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/28/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Ray, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jackson County Circuit Court County, case number 1716-CV09729, filed by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of United States of America. Filing fee $ 400 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A [State Court File], #3 Exhibit B [Torres declaration], #4 Exhibit C [US Attorney certification])(Ray, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
