H&R Block Tax Services LLC et al v. Emmerman, Boyle & Associates, LLC et al
| Franchise Partner, Inc. and H&R Block Tax Services LLC |
| David J. Emmerman, Emmerman, Boyle & Associates, LLC and Kevin P. Boyle |
| 4:2019cv00453 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Before the Court is a Notice of Dismissal. (Doc. #9). Defendants have not yet served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).. Signed on 8/8/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Franchise Partner, Inc., H&R Block Tax Services LLC (Romano, Anthony) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 & #7 motions to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorneys Peter J Klarfeld and Justin Sallis for H&R Block Tax Services LLC and Franchise Partner, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Geiser, Angel)
|
| Filing 7 Motion to allow Justin L. Sallis to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-6416437) filed by Anthony J. Romano on behalf of Franchise Partner, Inc., H&R Block Tax Services LLC. (Romano, Anthony) |
| Filing 6 Motion to allow Peter J. Klarfeld to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-6416426) filed by Anthony J. Romano on behalf of Franchise Partner, Inc., H&R Block Tax Services LLC. (Romano, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by H&R Block Tax Services LLC, Franchise Partner, Inc.. Kevin P. Boyle served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Romano, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by H&R Block Tax Services LLC, Franchise Partner, Inc.. Emmerman, Boyle & Associates, LLC served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Romano, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Anthony J. Romano on behalf of Plaintiffs Franchise Partner, Inc., H&R Block Tax Services LLC.(Romano, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kevin P. Boyle, David J. Emmerman, Emmerman, Boyle & Associates, LLC filed by Anthony J. Romano on behalf of H&R Block Tax Services LLC, Franchise Partner, Inc.. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6352254. Service due by 9/9/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Romano, Anthony) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kevin P. Boyle, David J. Emmerman, Emmerman, Boyle & Associates, LLC. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
