General Star National Insurance Company v. RM Innovations, LLC
| General Star National Insurance Company |
| RM Innovations, LLC, Travis Evans and Nick Morlan |
| 4:2019cv00784 |
| September 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Houston, Kiambu) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Curtis O. Roggow on behalf of Plaintiff General Star National Insurance Company.(Roggow, Curtis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against RM Innovations, LLC filed by Curtis O. Roggow on behalf of General Star National Insurance Company. Filing fee $400, receipt number BMOWDC-6508252. Service due by 12/26/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roggow, Curtis) (Attachment 6 replaced on 9/26/2019) (Crocker, Susan). Modified on 9/26/2019 to correct exhibit label (Crocker, Susan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
