McCarthy v. Jackson County Detention Center
| Ian McCarthy |
| Jackson County Detention Center |
| 4:2019cv00936 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Gary A Fenner |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this is case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must comply with the Court's previous orders. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 8
ORDER: ORDERED that this is case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must comply with the Court's previous orders. Signed on December 20, 2019 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court for the Western District of Missouri an initial partial filing fee of $0.66 on or before December 17, 2019, if he seeks to proceed with this case; (2) Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint as set forth herein on or before December 17, 2019, or his case will be dismissed without further notice; and (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for his use in filing an amended complaint. Signed on December 4, 2019 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (CLERK'S NOTE: Civil rights forms mailed to plaintiff with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 6 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Ian McCarthy. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed on November 22, 2019 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Ian McCarthy. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/6/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Ian McCarthy. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jackson County Detention Center filed by Ian McCarthy. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCarthy v. Jackson County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ian McCarthy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jackson County Detention Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
