Fambrough v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: William Fambrough
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv00952
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Referring Judge: Howard F Sachs
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2020 Filing 18 PRO Se MOTION for moratorium and textension filed by William Fambrough. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/7/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Crocker, Susan)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 2/6/2020. Proposed scheduling order due by 2/20/2020. Signed on 1/6/20 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER TRANSFERRING/REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Greg Kays for all further proceedings. District Judge Howard F. Sachs no longer assigned to case. Please note the new case number 4:19-cv-00952-DGK. Signed on 1/3/2020 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Kern, Kendra)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: The case is related to Case No. 19-398; with the consent of Judge Kays, it is hereby ORDERED that the above captioned case is transferred to the Honorable David Gregory Kays. Signed on 1/3/2020 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Kern, Kendra) Copy of order mailed to: William Fambrough 6101 N Belleview Ave. Kansas City, Mo. 64118.
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed on 1/3/2020 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Kern, Kendra)Copy of order mailed to: William Fambrough 6101 Belleview Ave. Kansas City, Mo. 64118.
January 3, 2020 Filing 13 Due to a clerical error, dkt. no. 13 reassigning this case has been deleted. The case remains with Judge Sachs pending entry of orders. Signed on 1/3/20 by Clerk of Court. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Moore, Terri)
December 30, 2019 Filing 12 PRO SE REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #8 MOTION for default judgment on behalf of Plaintiff William Fambrough. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Kern, Kendra)
December 19, 2019 Filing 11 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION for default judgment filed by Patricia J. Martin on behalf of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 1/2/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Martin, Patricia)
December 13, 2019 Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in support re #9 MOTION to stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Patricia J. Martin on behalf of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Brad Rosenthal, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Daniel Fishman)(Related document(s) #9 ) (Martin, Patricia)
December 13, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Patricia J. Martin on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/27/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Martin, Patricia)
December 10, 2019 Filing 8 PRO SE Motion for Default Judgment and Suggestions in Support filed by William Fambrough. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/24/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kern, Kendra)
December 3, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of filing Notice to State Court of Filing Notice of Removal by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Martin, Patricia)
November 27, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Crocker, Susan)
November 26, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to File a Responsive Pleading filed by Patricia J. Martin on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/10/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Martin, Patricia)
November 26, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Martin, Patricia)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of filing Notice to Plaintiff of Removal by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Martin, Patricia)
November 26, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Patricia J. Martin on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc. (Martin, Patricia)
November 26, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Seventh Judicial Circuit Court, Clay County County, case number 19CY-CV10623, Uber Technologies, Inc.. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6605156. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Martin, Patricia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fambrough v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Fambrough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Patricia J. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?