Slayden v. Center for Behavioral Medicine
| Anthony Slayden |
| Center for Behavioral Medicine |
| 4:2020cv00482 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Gary A Fenner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER and Discovery Plan by Anthony Slayden. (Randles, Rebecca) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant Center for Behavioral Medicine's Motion to Dismiss. Reply suggestions due by 8/11/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Crocker, Susan) |
| Filing 14 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant Center for Behavioral Medicine's Motion to Dismiss filed by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of Plaintiff Anthony Slayden. (Related document(s) #5 ). Reply suggestions due by 8/11/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Randles, Rebecca) Modified on 7/31/2020 to correct docket event and set reply deadline (Crocker, Susan). |
| Filing 13 MOTION to amend/correct Petition filed by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/11/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Randles, Rebecca) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to amend/correct Petition filed by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of Anthony Slayden. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/4/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Randles, Rebecca) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for extension of time to respond to Motion to Dismiss filed by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of Anthony Slayden. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/4/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Randles, Rebecca) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to order re #8 Order to Show Cause, filed by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of Plaintiff Anthony Slayden. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Randles, Rebecca) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of Anthony Slayden (Attorney Rebecca M. Randles added to party Anthony Slayden(pty:pla))(Randles, Rebecca) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why defendant's Motion to Dismiss #5 should not be granted.Show Cause Response due by 7/21/2020. Signed on 7/7/20 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa) Mailed to Anthony Slayden, 6632 Lydia Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64130 on 7/7/2020 (Crocker, Susan).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER terminating plaintiff's counsel Paul Franco. Signed on 7/1/20 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa) Modified on 7/1/2020 to reflect a copy of this order has been mailed via regular and certified mail (7010 2780 0002 4068 9064) to Anthony Slayden 6632 Lydia Avenue Kansas City, MO 64130 (Ellis, Lindsey).
|
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
| Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS in support re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant Center for Behavioral Medicine's Motion to Dismiss filed by Rachel Louise Jag on behalf of Defendant Center for Behavioral Medicine. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Jag, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant Center for Behavioral Medicine's Motion to Dismiss filed by Rachel Louise Jag on behalf of Center for Behavioral Medicine. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/6/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Jag, Rachel) |
|
Filing 4
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 8/3/2020. Rule 26 conference due by 7/24/2020. Signed on 6/19/20 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Rachel Louise Jag on behalf of Center for Behavioral Medicine (Jag, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri at Kansas City County, case number 1916-CV26778, filed by Rachel Louise Jag on behalf of Center for Behavioral Medicine. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6898172. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet B, #3 Exhibit C)(Jag, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Slayden v. Center for Behavioral Medicine | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Center for Behavioral Medicine | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Louise Jag |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Slayden | |
| Represented By: | Paul S. Franco |
| Represented By: | Rebecca M. Randles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
