Ikpe v. Aramark et al
Plaintiff: Stephany M. Ikpe
Defendant: Aramark Services, In Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Food and Sup Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Facility Ser Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Intermediate Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Aramark Healthcare S Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC, Aramark Management S Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark SMMS LLC Aramark SMMS LLC, Aramark Aramark, Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark SMMS LLC, Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC and Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation
Case Number: 4:2020cv00788
Filed: October 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2020 Filing 15 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Stephany M. Ikpe. (Richards, Kip)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER scheduling a Settlement Conference for 1/6/2021 at 09:30 AM via Video Teleconference before Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. The parties' settlement conference statements shall be sent via email to Sarah_Kanoy@mow.uscourts.gov by 5 p.m. on January 4, 2021. Additional details regarding the parties' attendance, settlement conference statements, and format of the settlement conference are found in the Court's Standing Order for Mediations and Settlement Conferences, which has been emailed to the parties. Signed on 11/13/20 by Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Kanoy, Sarah)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 11/16/2020. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/30/2020. Signed on 10/13/20 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 motion for extension of time to file response/reply. Answer due on or before 12/8/2020. Signed on 10/13/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk)
October 6, 2020 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Mikaela R Shaw on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/20/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Shaw, Mikaela)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Stephanie L. Sweitzer for Aramark, Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC, Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark SMMS LLC and Aramark Services, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal)
October 5, 2020 Filing 9 Motion to allow Stephanie L. Sweitzer to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7079365) filed by Elizabeth Brooke Herrington on behalf of All Defendants. (Herrington, Elizabeth)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Mikaela R Shaw for Aramark, Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC, Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark SMMS LLC and Aramark Services, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal)
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 Motion to allow Mikaela R. Shaw to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7079294) filed by Elizabeth Brooke Herrington on behalf of All Defendants. (Herrington, Elizabeth)
October 5, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
October 2, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of filing Notice of Removal With State Court by Aramark, Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC, Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark SMMS LLC, Aramark Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal to State Court)(Herrington, Elizabeth)
October 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Exhibit A State Court File by Aramark, Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC, Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark SMMS LLC, Aramark Services, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Herrington, Elizabeth)
October 2, 2020 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Elizabeth Brooke Herrington on behalf of Defendants Aramark, Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC, Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Aramark SMMS LLC, Aramark Services, Inc..(Herrington, Elizabeth)
October 2, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Elizabeth Brooke Herrington on behalf of All Defendants (Herrington, Elizabeth)
October 2, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County County, case number 2016-CV17815, filed by Elizabeth Brooke Herrington on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-7076980.(Herrington, Elizabeth) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2020: #1 State Court Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Berner, Crystal).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ikpe v. Aramark et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Services, In Aramark Services, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Food and Sup Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Facility Ser Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Intermediate Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Healthcare S Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Management S Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark SMMS LLC Aramark SMMS LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Aramark
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark SMMS LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Services, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corporation
Represented By: Elizabeth Brooke Herrington
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Represented By: Mikaela R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephany M. Ikpe
Represented By: Vanessa Scorcia Herman
Represented By: David M. Skeens
Represented By: Kip D. Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?