Squix, LLC v. Vinebox Inc.
Squix, LLC |
Vinebox Inc. |
4:2021cv00105 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Brian C Wimes |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Clerk's ORDER OF DISMISSAL without prejudice, pursuant to #15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. (Anderson, Christy) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Squix, LLC (Burbach, Cheryl) |
Filing 14 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Squix, LLC. Vinebox Inc. served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. (Brown, Scott) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #7 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Jonas N Hagey for Vinebox Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #6 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Jeffrey M Theodore for Vinebox Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #5 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Bram Schumer for Vinebox Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Robin K. Carlson on behalf of Defendant Vinebox Inc..(Carlson, Robin) |
Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in support re #8 MOTION to reassign/transfer case Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) filed by Robin K. Carlson on behalf of Defendant Vinebox Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Matt Dukes, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Bram Schumer)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Carlson, Robin) |
Filing 8 MOTION to reassign/transfer case Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) filed by Robin K. Carlson on behalf of Vinebox Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/18/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carlson, Robin) |
Filing 7 Motion to allow Jonas Noah Hagey to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7316662) filed by Robin K. Carlson on behalf of Vinebox Inc.. (Carlson, Robin) |
Filing 6 Motion to allow Jeffrey M. Theodore to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7316660) filed by Robin K. Carlson on behalf of Vinebox Inc.. (Carlson, Robin) |
Filing 5 Motion to allow Bram Schumer to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7316658) filed by Robin K. Carlson on behalf of Vinebox Inc.. (Attorney Robin K. Carlson added to party Vinebox Inc.(pty:dft))(Carlson, Robin) |
Filing 4 Report on the filing of an action regarding trademark number(s) 5,388,168 - 5,388,169. Plaintiff(s): Squix, LLC Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Cheryl Lynn Burbach Hovey Williams LLP 10801 Mastin Blvd. Ste. 1000 84 Corporate Woods Overland Park, KS 66210 (913) 647-9050 Fax: (913) 647-9057 Email: clb@hoveywilliams.com Defendant(s): Vinebox Inc. Lead Attorney for Defendant(s): Bram Schumer, Braun Hagey & Borden LLP, 351 California Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94101 The civil complaint is attached. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Cheryl Lynn Burbach on behalf of Plaintiff Squix, LLC.(Burbach, Cheryl) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Vinebox Inc.. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vinebox Inc. filed by Cheryl Lynn Burbach on behalf of Squix, LLC. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7296100. Service due by 5/24/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Burbach, Cheryl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/24/2021: #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Crocker, Susan). Modified on 2/24/2021 to add Exhibits A and B per attorney request. Regenerated NEF (Crocker, Susan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.