Smith v. Redington
Petitioner: Derrick Ray Smith
Respondent: Dan Redington
Case Number: 4:2021cv00449
Filed: June 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that the Court has received a discovery request from Plaintiff, which will not be filed in the case. The Local Rules require that such documents be served on the parties directly and not be sent to the Court for filing. When the discovery request or response has been served, the party that served the discovery document must then file a certificate of service. Signed on 8/24/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER that Respondent's motion for extension of time (Doc. #12 ) is granted. Respondent shall file a response on or before September 8, 2021. Signed on 8/9/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
August 9, 2021 Filing 12 First MOTION for extension of time to file response filed by Andrew Clarke on behalf of Dan Redington. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/23/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Clarke, Andrew)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #9 ) is denied without prejudice, because it does not yet appear that an evidentiary hearing is required in this matter or that appointment of counsel is required for the fair presentation of Petitioner's claims. See Hoggard v. Purkett, 29 F.3d 469, 471 (8th Cir. 1994) (Where an evidentiary hearing is not required, the district court retains discretion to determine whether counsel should be appointed.)Signed on 8/3/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that the Court has received a discovery request from Petitioner that will not be filed in the case. The Local Rules require that such documents be served on the parties directly and not be sent to the Court for filing. When the discovery request has been served, the party that served the discovery document must then file a certificate of service. Signed on 8/3/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of the Local Rules mailed to Petitioner with a copy of this Order.) (Willis, Kathy)
August 3, 2021 Filing 9 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Derrick Ray Smith. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Memorandum)(Willis, Kathy)
July 16, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew Clarke on behalf of Dan Redington (Attorney Andrew Clarke added to party Dan Redington(pty:res))(Clarke, Andrew)
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before August 9, 2021, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on July 9, 2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
July 9, 2021 Filing 6 PETITIONER'S NOTICE of filing of executed signature page as directed by 6/29/21 order (Doc. #5 ) filed by Derrick Ray Smith. (Davies, Cindy)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this petition on or before July 13, 2021; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with petition signature page; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on June 29, 2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. (CLERK'S NOTE: Petition signature page mailed to petitioner with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
June 28, 2021 Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Derrick Ray Smith. (Davies, Cindy)
June 28, 2021 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Derrick Ray Smith. (Davies, Cindy)
June 28, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Derrick Ray Smith.(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Redington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Ray Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dan Redington
Represented By: Andrew Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?