Kelem-Lum'a v. Molendorp et al
Chief Ix Kelem-Lum'a |
Chris Molendorp and Cass County Missouri |
4:2021cv00565 |
August 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Howard F Sachs |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1 ) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the complaint (Doc. [1-1]) against all Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's pro se motion for order (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that the clerk of the court mail a copy of this order by regular mail and certified mail, return receipt to plaintiff at: 204 S. Lyne Avenue, Raymore, MO 64083 Signed on 10/6/2021 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Nolte, Melissa) Certified mail tracking number 7019 1120 0000 1689 7370. |
Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION for order requesting USM to effectuate service filed by Ix Kelem-Lum'a. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/21/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Ix Kelem-Lum'a. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ix Kelem-Lum'a. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/23/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.