Davis v. Godert
| Larneal D. Davis |
| Superintendent Chantay Godert |
| 4:2021cv00630 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Gary A Fenner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause 5 filed by Michael Gideon Marta on behalf of Respondent Chantay Godert. Reply suggestions due by 11/9/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Direct Appeal Opinion, #2 Exhibit Direct Appeal Mandate, #3 Exhibit PCR Opinion, #4 Exhibit PCR Mandate, #5 Exhibit Trial Transcript, #6 Exhibit Record on Appeal, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Deposition, #8 Exhibit Jury Instruction Number 12, #9 Exhibit Appellant's Brief on Direct Appeal, #10 Exhibit Respondent's Brief on Direct Appeal, #11 Exhibit Appellant's Brief on PCR Appeal, #12 Exhibit Appellant's PCR appendix, #13 Exhibit Respondent's Brief on PCR appeal, #14 Exhibit PCR Legal File)(Marta, Michael) Modified on 10/28/2021 to correct docket event (Crocker, Susan). |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 motion for extension of time to file response/reply Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/5/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Signed on 10/25/21 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Mitchell, Lisa)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Michael Gideon Marta on behalf of Chantay Godert. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/21/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Marta, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Michael Gideon Marta on behalf of Chantay Godert (Attorney Michael Gideon Marta added to party Chantay Godert(pty:res))(Marta, Michael) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why petitioner's motion for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.Show Cause Response due by 10/8/2021. Signed on 9/8/21 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa) Modified on 9/8/2021 to reflect a copy of the Order mailed to Chantay Godert, Superintendent Northeast Correctional Center 13698 Airport Road Bowling Green, MO 63334 (Woods, Gloria).
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kent E. Gipson on behalf of Larneal D. Davis. Filing fee $5, receipt number AMOWDC-7562964. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Gipson, Kent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Godert | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Larneal D. Davis | |
| Represented By: | Kent E. Gipson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Superintendent Chantay Godert | |
| Represented By: | Michael Gideon Marta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
