Pichelman Goforth v. DST Systems Inc
| Margaret Pichelman Goforth |
| DST Systems Inc |
| 4:2021cv09192 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Nanette K Laughrey |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Jill McManus Newtal against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Tracy Alden against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Michael Spellman against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Della Graybeal against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Joseph Kenney against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Beth Rudolph against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Margaret Pichelman Goforth against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Jennifer McCord against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Leslie Riley against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Parminderjit Singh against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Martha Sabin against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Stephanie Stevens against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Kathleen Sarette against DST Systems Inc (Lock, Tania) |
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey GRANTING motions to confirm arbitration awards ((1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09185-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09186-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09188-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09189-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09190-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09191-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09192-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09193-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09194-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09195-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09196-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09197-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09198-NKL). This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
| Filing 9 ***Remark - This case has been converted to a civil case. The case type has been changed to "cv" with the case number remaining the same. Please update your records to reflect this change. All documents should be filed in the civil case. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. (/font> (Matthes Mitra, Renea) |
| Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #1 MOTION for order confirm arbitration award filed by Robert T. Adams on behalf of Defendant DST Systems Inc. Reply suggestions due by 12/14/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Adams, Robert) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ENTRY: Teleconference held before the Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey on November 19, 2021, regarding Defendant's request to stay the proceedings. The Court ordered Defendant to respond to the motions for confirmation of arbitration awards by the deadlines as required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court took Defendant's motion for a stay under advisement. Counsel for Plaintiff's: JNan Kimak, John Soper, Chelsea Pierce, Andrew Schermerhorn, John Klamann, Kenneth McClain, William Carr and George Kapke, Jr. Counsel for Defendant: Megan Egli, Robert Adams, Jeff Recher and Lewis Clayton. Court Reporter: Kathy Calvert. Courtroom Deputy: Tania Lock. Time in Court: 4:00 p.m. 4:12 p.m. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Kathy Calvert, 816-512-5741, kathy_calvert@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER entered by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. A Telephone Conference is set for 11/19/2021 at 4:00 PM. The parties shall call conference number 877-336-1828, access code: 8503666 to participate. Signed on 11/19/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER entered by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. A Telephone Conference is set for 11/19/2021 at 4:00 PM. The parties shall call conference number 877-336-1828, access code: 8503666 to participate. Signed on 11/19/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Letter by DST Systems Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Adams, Robert) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING/REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey for all further proceedings. District Judge Roseann Ketchmark no longer assigned to case. Signed on 11/16/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Brown, Jonathan)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Margaret Pichelman Goforth re #1 MOTION for order confirm arbitration award filed by J'Nan Kimak on behalf of Plaintiff Margaret Pichelman Goforth. Related document: #1 MOTION for order confirm arbitration award filed by Margaret Pichelman Goforth.(Kimak, J'Nan) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for order confirm arbitration award filed by J'Nan Kimak on behalf of Margaret Pichelman Goforth. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/30/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Kimak, J'Nan) |
| MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATED by J'Nan Kimak on behalf of Margaret Pichelman Goforth. See motion immediately following this entry for details. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. Filing fee $49, receipt number BMOWDC-7673708. (Kimak, J'Nan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
