Acton v. Rahn
Larry Thomas Acton |
Kaye Lynn Rahn |
4:2022cv00281 |
April 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Howard F Sachs |
Other Fraud |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Larry Thomas Acton. (Kern, Kendra) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Larry Thomas Acton. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/13/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Supplement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Acton v. Rahn | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry Thomas Acton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kaye Lynn Rahn | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.