Sandcraft, LLC v. KB3 UTV LLC et al
Sandcraft, LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Sandcraft Motorsports |
KB3 UTV LLC and KB3 UTV Products, LLC |
4:2022cv00663 |
October 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 extension of time. A copy of this order was mailed to Defendants registered agent, Kenneth Bell, at 145 W. Vivian St., Belton, Missouri, 64012 and 515 Chase Lane, Belton, Missouri, 64012. A copy of this order was also emailed to Kenneth Bell at the email listed in his motion (Kb3utv@gmail.com). Signed on November 22, 2022, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk). Modified to identify all addresses on 11/22/2022 (Law Clerk). |
Filing 8 PRO SE MOTION to appoint counsel by Registered Agent Kenneth Bell filed by KB3 UTV LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/22/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Maria Crimi Speth for Sandcraft, LLC allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal) |
Filing 6 Motion to allow Maria Crimi Speth to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8184755) filed by Scott R. Brown on behalf of Sandcraft, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of United States District Court Admissions)(Brown, Scott) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Sandcraft, LLC. KB3 UTV LLC served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (Brown, Scott) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Sandcraft, LLC. KB3 UTV Products, LLC served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (Brown, Scott) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Ellis, Lindsey) |
Filing 2 Report on the filing of an action regarding patent number(s) US 9, 956, 872 B2. Plaintiff(s): Sandcraft, LLC Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Scott R. Brown Hovey Williams LLP 10801 Mastin Blvd. Ste. 1000 84 Corporate Woods Overland Park, KS 66210 Defendant(s): KB3 UTV LLC, KB3 UTV Products, LLC The civil complaint is attached. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Ellis, Lindsey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KB3 UTV LLC, KB3 UTV Products, LLC filed by Scott R. Brown on behalf of Sandcraft, LLC dba Sandcraft Motorsports. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8156175. Service due by 1/17/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 9,956,872, #2 Exhibit B - Accused Products, #3 Exhibit C - Claims Chart, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Scott) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to KB3 UTV LLC, KB3 UTV Products, LLC. (Ellis, Lindsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.