Harris v. Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc.
Christine Harris |
Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc. doing business as Vision Source Eyecare |
4:2024cv00515 |
August 7, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Ellen Catherine Rudolph on behalf of Defendant Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc..(Rudolph, Ellen) |
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of appearance by John J. Ziegelmeyer, III on behalf of Christine Harris (Attorney John J. Ziegelmeyer, III added to party Christine Harris(pty:pla))(Ziegelmeyer, John) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Patrick Nathaniel Fanning on behalf of Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc. (Attorney Patrick Nathaniel Fanning added to party Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc.(pty:dft))(Fanning, Patrick) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, on behalf of Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc..(Rudolph, Ellen) |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 Complaint, Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Ellen Catherine Rudolph on behalf of Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/13/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Attorney Ellen Catherine Rudolph added to party Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rudolph, Ellen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts to District Judge Greg Kays. Judge Counts no longer associated with this case. Please note the new case number: 24-515-CV-W-DGK. (Melvin, Greg) |
SECOND NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 9/20/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Melvin, Greg) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Christine Harris. Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc. served on 8/13/2024, answer due 9/3/2024. (Crockett, Ethan) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc.. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Insight Eyecare Specialties, Inc. filed by Ethan Alexander Crockett on behalf of Christine Harris. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-9140060. Service due by 11/5/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Ex. A - Civil Cover Sheet)(Crockett, Ethan) |
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 8/28/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.