Davis v. Rosewood Operator, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Tanisha Davis
Defendant: Rosewood Operator, LLC and Charles Woolsoncroft
Case Number: 4:2025cv00060
Filed: January 30, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2025 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Katherine Leigh Cooper on behalf of Plaintiff Tanisha Davis.(Cooper, Katherine)
March 14, 2025 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Carrie L. Kinsella on behalf of Defendants Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft.(Kinsella, Carrie)
March 14, 2025 Filing 15 DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL naming Dave Vogel(Kinsella, Carrie)
March 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/31/2025. Dispositive Motions due by 11/28/2025. Pretrial Conference set for 7/20/2026 at 02:00 PM via telephone conference with District Judge Greg Kays. Jury Trial set for 8/17/2026at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8D, Kansas City (DGK) before District Judge Greg Kays. Signed on March 13, 2025, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk) Modified on 3/14/2025 to correct docket text. (Strodtman, Tracy)
March 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 motion for protective order. Signed on March 11, 2025, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk)
March 11, 2025 Filing 12 Joint MOTION for protective order filed by Carrie L. Kinsella on behalf of Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/25/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kinsella, Carrie)
March 11, 2025 Filing 11 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft. (Kinsella, Carrie)
February 14, 2025 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Carrie L. Kinsella on behalf of Defendant Rosewood Operator, LLC.(Kinsella, Carrie)
February 6, 2025 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft.(Kinsella, Carrie)
February 5, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of filing of Removal to State Clerk by Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft (Kinsella, Carrie)
January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 3/3/2025. Proposed scheduling order due by 3/17/2025. Signed on 1/31/25 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER. All attorneys and unrepresented parties shall carefully study and comply with the ISO along with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Western District of Missouri's Local Rules (the Local Rules). Failure to comply with the ISO may result in the Court imposing sanctions, including but not limited to monetary payments, dismissal of claims or cases, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate sanctions. Signed on 1/31/25 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/31/2025) (Strodtman, Tracy).
January 30, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
January 30, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Lauren Hope Beck on behalf of Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft (Beck, Lauren)
January 30, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Carrie L. Kinsella on behalf of Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft (Kinsella, Carrie)
January 30, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE of filing to Plaintiff of Notice of Removal by Rosewood Operator, LLC, Charles Woolsoncroft (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Notice to Clerk of Removal)(Kinsella, Carrie)
January 30, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2416-CV36138, filed by Carrie L. Kinsella. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-9414884. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Kinsella, Carrie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Rosewood Operator, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanisha Davis
Represented By: Katherine Leigh Cooper
Represented By: Ryan Paulus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosewood Operator, LLC
Represented By: Lauren Hope Beck
Represented By: Carrie L. Kinsella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Woolsoncroft
Represented By: Lauren Hope Beck
Represented By: Carrie L. Kinsella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?