Crossfit, LLC. v. Brownlee et al
| Crossfit, LLC. |
| Jeremy Brownlee and CrossFit Lee's Summit |
| 4:2025cv00093 |
| February 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Crocker, Susan) |
| Filing 3 Report on the filing of an action regarding trademark number(s) 3,007,458. Plaintiff(s): CrossFit, LLC Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Jason Mudd Defendant(s): Jeremy Brownlee, et al The civil complaint is attached. (Crocker, Susan) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Jason Mudd on behalf of Plaintiff Crossfit, LLC..(Mudd, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeremy Brownlee, CrossFit Lee's Summit filed by Jason Mudd on behalf of Crossfit, LLC.. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-9435856. Service due by 5/13/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Mudd, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
