Accurso v. USA
| Anthony W Accurso |
| USA |
| 5:2019cv06125 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (CLERK'S NOTE: All documents pertaining to this case are on CM/ECF. Nothing will be sent to the Court of Appeals.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit is 19-3193 for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony W Accurso. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 7 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #6 Notice of Appeal. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Clerk's Judgment filed by Anthony W Accurso. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that: (1) Movant's motion for discovery (Doc. #2 ) is denied; and (2) this case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A) and 28 U.S.C. 2255(h)(1), (2). (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Movant's motion for discovery (Doc. #2 ) is denied; and (2) this case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A) and 28 U.S.C. 2255(h)(1), (2). Signed on September 24, 2019 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 2 MOVANT'S MOTION for discovery filed by Anthony W Accurso. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/7/2019. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) with brief in support filed by Anthony W Accurso. (Attachment: #1 Affidavit and Exhibits A-E)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Accurso v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony W Accurso | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
