Lewis v. Accurate Background, LLC
| Bradley Lewis |
| Accurate Background, LLC |
| 5:2022cv06029 |
| February 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER re: #12 NOTICE of settlement and Request to Stay Case Deadlines : having been notified of settlement of this case, the Court STAYS all deadlines. The Court directs Plaintiff to file, within 60 days, a notice of dismissal or, if required by Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. If the settlement is not perfected within 60 days, Plaintiff must file a status report including an anticipated timeline. Signed on March 25, 2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of settlement and Request to Stay Case Deadlines by Accurate Background, LLC (Drury, John) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney John W. Drury for Accurate Background, LLC allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Accurate Background, LLC.(McNamara, Rosalee) |
| Filing 9 Motion to allow John W. Drury to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7840955) filed by Rosalee Miller McNamara on behalf of Accurate Background, LLC. (McNamara, Rosalee) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Pamela DeVata for Accurate Background, LLC allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
|
| Filing 7 Motion to allow Pamela Q. Devata to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7836217) filed by Rosalee Miller McNamara on behalf of Accurate Background, LLC. (McNamara, Rosalee) |
|
Filing 6
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 3/18/2022. Proposed scheduling order due by 4/1/2022. Signed on February 16, 2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Accurate Background, LLC's answer due on or before 3/10/2022. Signed on 2/16/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) filed by Rosalee Miller McNamara on behalf of Accurate Background, LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/2/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McNamara, Rosalee) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Rosalee Miller McNamara on behalf of Defendant Accurate Background, LLC.(McNamara, Rosalee) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Clinton County, case number 21CN-CC00077, Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7800134. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McNamara, Rosalee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Accurate Background, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bradley Lewis | |
| Represented By: | Charles Jason Brown |
| Represented By: | Jayson A. Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Accurate Background, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Rosalee Miller McNamara |
| Represented By: | John W. Drury |
| Represented By: | Pamela DeVata |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
