USA v. Perales
6:1999cv03283 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Springfield Office |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER adopting 101 report and recommendation. Signed on 3/16/2021 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Maerz, Mary) Modified on 3/16/2021 (Maerz, Mary). The Clerk is directed to notify the parties and the court of appeals that the District Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A). Modified on 3/16/2021 (Maerz, Mary). |
Filing 95 ORDER dismissing 90 motion and adopting 92 report and recommendation. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Defendant at his last known address. Signed on 1/6/21 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Maerz, Mary) |
Filing 75 ORDER adopting the 73 report and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; denying 72 defendant's pro so motion for the statutory semi-annual conditional release discharge hearing. Signed on 8/19/2019 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Levin, Benjamin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. Perales | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.