Mitan v. Osborn et al
| Keith J. Mitan |
| Donna Osborn, Community Publishers, Inc. and Ozarks Newsstand |
| 6:2010cv03207 |
| May 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Springfield Office |
| Christian |
| Sarah W. Hays |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Sanctions 85 is granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v), plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that to the extent that plaintiff has not yet paid James Condry, plaintiff is directed to pay his costs of the mediation before Mr. Condry in the amount of $500.00. Signed on 9/23/2013 by Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays. (Bliss, Sue)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants Donna Osborn and Community Publishers, Inc. to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint and/or for Summary Judgment (doc #14) is denied. It is furtherORDERED that defendants are given twenty days from the dat e of this Order in which to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. It is furtherORDERED that because the Court deferred entering a scheduling order until this motion was ruled, the parties are to provide an amended proposed scheduling order within thirty days. Signed on 9/16/2011 by Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays. (Gicinto, JoRita)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
