Hackworth v. Kansas City Veterans Administration Medical Center et al
| Jeffery D. Hackworth |
| Kansas City Veterans Administration Medical Center, Kent D. Hill, Kevin Q. Inkley, James F. Sanders, Michael C. Moore, John and Jane 1-100 Does, Department of Treasury, Jacob J. Lew, Neal Wolin and Mark A. Patterson |
| 6:2013cv03363 |
| September 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Springfield Office |
| Dallas |
| J. Frederick Motz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 70 motion for summary judgment; denying 71 motion to declare laws unconstitutional; granting 72 motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Plaintiff is granted one last opportunity to cure the def iciencies stated in his Complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to file a Third Amended Complaint, he must do so within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff. Signed on 2/6/2015 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Hance, Breanna)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 56 motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; granting 56 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff granted leave in order to file Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days, should he choose to do so. Signed on 11/26/2014 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff. (Hance, Breanna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
