USA v. Lamons
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Adam Lamons
Case Number: 6:2017cv03032
Filed: February 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: M. Douglas Harpool
Presiding Judge: David P. Rush
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 4246
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 unopposed motion to unseal documents. Signed on 10/7/2020 by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. (GK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Lamons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Lamons
Represented By: Ann M. Koszuth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Cynthia J. Hyde
Represented By: Christina L. Scofield(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?