Wilson v. Morgan et al
Brian Scott Wilson |
Chad Morgan and Jimmy Russell |
6:2019cv03221 |
June 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Beth Phillips |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: (1) Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert his claims, he first must pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $400. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert his claims, he first must pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $400. Signed on 07/02/2019 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy) |
MAIL RETURNED as undeliverable; marked "return to send, refused, unable to forward, not current resident" Mail sent to Brian Scott Wilson. (Related document(s) 4 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Brian Scott Wilson. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Brian Scott Wilson. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Brian Scott Wilson. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.