Hill v. Cedar County, Missouri et al
| Shane V Hill |
| Jay Williams, Garrett Lukenbill, Leon Dwerlkotte, Larry Roberts, Marvin Schutten and Cedar County, Missouri |
| 6:2019cv03243 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid; (2) the Clerk of Court issue appropriate summons as authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, and deliver the summons, the complaint, and a copy of this order to the United States Marshal for service of process; (3) the United States Marshal attempt personal service of process at no cost to Plaintiff on Defendants (a) Garrett Lukenbill, (b) Leon Dwerlkotte, (c) Larry Roberts, (d) Marvin Schutten, (e) Jay Williams, at (202 S. High Street, Stockton, MO, 65785), and on (f) Cedar County, Missouri, to Commissioners Marlon Collins, Don Boultinghouse, and Bob Foster at 113 South Street, Stockton, MO 65785; (4) If any of the individual defendants may not be served at the address listed above, the remaining individual defendants are directed to provide the last-known address for those defendants within twenty-one days after service of process; and (5) Defendants answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, within twenty-one days after service of process. Signed on August 23, 2019 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Leon Dwerlkotte, Garrett Lukenbill, Larry Roberts, Marvin Schutten, Jay Williams and Cedar County, Missouri to Commissioners Marlon Collins, Don Boultinghouse, and Bob Foster. Copy of USM-285, summons, complaint and order of 8/23/19 sent to US Marshals Service for PERSONAL service. (Davies, Cindy) |
| RECEIPT number KCMO078938 in the amount of $3.03 issued to Missouri Department of Corrections on behalf of Shane Hill. (Woods, Gloria) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before August 9, 2019 as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on July 26. 2019 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $3.03; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before July 24, 2019, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on July 10, 2019 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Shane V Hill. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Shane V Hill. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Shane V Hill. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
