Smart v. Meyers et al
Andrew M Smart |
Rich Meyers and Polk County Jail |
6:2020cv03161 |
May 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Beth Phillips |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER: ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's motion for summary judgment on or before August 12, 2020, or face dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 07/22/2020 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 14 SUGGESTIONS in support re #13 MOTION for summary judgment filed by David S. Baker on behalf of Defendant Rich Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Rich Myers, #2 Exhibit A.1 - Booking Information, #3 Exhibit B - Case Net Records for 20PO-CR00158, #4 Exhibit C - Case Net Records for 20PO-CR000158-01)(Related document(s) #13 ) (Baker, David) |
Filing 13 MOTION for summary judgment filed by David S. Baker on behalf of Rich Meyers. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/12/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Baker, David) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by David S. Baker on behalf of Defendant Rich Meyers.(Baker, David) |
Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Andrew M Smart.(Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by by Polk County Jail.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Andrew M Smart.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 8 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed on 06/30/2020 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Rich Meyers.(Attorney David S. Baker added to party Rich Meyers(pty:dft))(Baker, David) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed. Jail Administrator Rich Meyers served on 6/11/2020. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) the agency having custody of the Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid; (3) Defendant Polk County Jail is severed and dismissed from this case; (4) the Clerk of the Court shall issue appropriate summons as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, and shall deliver the summons, the complaint, and a copy of this Order to the United States Marshal for service of process on Defendant Myers (at 113 E. Jefferson St., Bolivar, MO 65613); (5) the United States Marshal shall attempt service of process of the summons, the complaint, and a copy of this Order upon Defendant Myers at the above addresses as directed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4; and (6) Defendant Myers shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. Signed on 06/01/2020 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rich Meyers. Copy of USM 285 Summons, Complaint, and Order dated 06/01/2020 delivered to US Marshal's Service for service. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.