Laduke v. Southerland Transport, LLC et al
Timothy J Laduke |
Larry Keasler and Southerland Transport, LLC |
6:2020cv03396 |
December 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
M Douglas Harpool |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to strike Claims for Prejudgment Interest filed by Paul D. Link on behalf of Larry Keasler. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/19/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Link, Paul) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand on behalf of Larry Keasler.(Attorney Paul D. Link added to party Larry Keasler(pty:dft))(Link, Paul) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Keller, Jeanne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry Keasler, Southerland Transport, LLC filed by Brad L. Bradshaw on behalf of Timothy J Laduke. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7180819. Service due by 3/10/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bradshaw, Brad) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Larry Keasler, Southerland Transport, LLC, and e-mailed to Plaintiff's counsel. (Keller, Jeanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.