Bell v. Precythe et al
| Johnell A Bell |
| Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Christopher Meier, Cooper, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5, John Doe #6 and Texas County, Missouri |
| 6:2022cv03199 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Show Cause Order (Doc. 9 ) filed by Johnell A Bell.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 10
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery (Doc. #8 ) is DENIED without prejudice as Plaintiff has not yet paid the initial partial filing fee, no parties have been served, and the case is subject to review and possibly pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed on 8/24/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before SEPTEMBER 6, 2022, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on 8/23/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for expedited discovery filed by Johnell A Bell. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE filed by Johnell A Bell.(Willis, Kathy) (Related document #5 ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice because the record is not sufficiently developed to determine whether appointment of counsel is warranted and the case is subject to review and possibly pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Plaintiff is advised that "[t]here is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil cases." Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (citing Edington v. Missouri Dept of Corr., 52 F.3d 777, 780 (8th Cir. 1995)). Rather, "[i]n civil rights matters the court may, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, 'request' an attorney to represent a party if, within the court's discretion, the circumstances are such that would properly justify such a request." Mosby v. Mabry, 697 F.2d 213, 214 (8th Cir. 1982). Signed on 8/9/22 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sholes, Amber)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, an initial partial filing fee of $130.09; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before August 18, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 8/4/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 4 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Johnell A Bell. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Johnell A Bell. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Johnell A Bell. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement/uncertified)(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Johnell A Bell. (#1 1983 Complaint attachments, #2 1983 Complaint exhibits)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
