Reed v. CoxHealth et al
Plaintiff: Steven L. Reed
Defendant: CoxHealth, Mercy and Anthem Insurance
Case Number: 6:2025cv03091
Filed: April 16, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying #15 motion for reconsideration. Signed on 06/12/2025 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (MAR)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PRO SE MOTION for reconsideration re #13 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Steven L. Reed. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/25/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #13 ) (JSH)
June 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (LKH)
June 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #2 motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 06/02/2025 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (MAR)
May 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying #6 motion to continue. Signed on 05/28/2025 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (MAR)
May 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #2 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Response to Plaintiff Reed's Reply Suggestions Against Defendant CoxHealth's May 6th Motion to Dismiss filed by Gray Malkmus on behalf of Defendant CoxHealth. (Related document(s) #2 ) (Malkmus, Gray)
May 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PRO SE REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #6 MOTION to continue on behalf of Plaintiff Steven L. Reed. (Related document(s) #6 ) (JSH)
May 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRO SE SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #2 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on behalf of Plaintiff Steven L. Reed. Reply suggestions due by 6/10/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #2 ) (JSH)
May 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #6 MOTION to continue filed by Gray Malkmus on behalf of Defendant CoxHealth. Reply suggestions due by 6/5/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #6 ) (Malkmus, Gray)
May 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by Gray Malkmus on behalf of CoxHealth (Attorney Gray Malkmus added to party CoxHealth(pty:dft))(Malkmus, Gray)
May 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRO SE MOTION to continue filed by Steven L. Reed. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/22/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Siegert, Karen)
May 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Steven L. Reed. Mercy served on 4/16/2025, answer due 5/7/2025. (Siegert, Karen)
May 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Steven L. Reed. CoxHealth served on 4/16/2025, answer due 5/7/2025. (Siegert, Karen)
May 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Brian D. Malkmus on behalf of CoxHealth (Malkmus, Brian)
May 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Brian D. Malkmus on behalf of CoxHealth. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/20/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Attorney Brian D. Malkmus added to party CoxHealth(pty:dft))(Malkmus, Brian)
April 18, 2025 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number DMOW400007912 in the amount of $405 issued to Steven Reed. Check # 54445. (Crocker, Susan)
April 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Steven L. Reed. Service due by 7/15/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Verified Complaint, and Jury Trial, Demanded on all Counts, #2 attachments, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siegert, Karen) Modified on 4/16/2025 filing fee paid $405-Cashier's Check mailed to Finance, Kansas City (Siegert, Karen).
April 16, 2025 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants. (Siegert, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. CoxHealth et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven L. Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CoxHealth
Represented By: Gray Malkmus
Represented By: Brian D. Malkmus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthem Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?