Decker Coal Company v. United States of America et al
| Decker Coal Company |
| United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Ken Salazar and Walter D. Cruickshank |
| 1:2009cv00026 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| BIG HORN |
| Richard F. Cebull |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Order, Findings and Recommendations 20 Motion to Remand to Agency, filed by Ken Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States of America, Walter D. Cruickshank. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 2/16/2010. The IBLA Decision dated January 5, 2009 is VACATED and case is REMANDED to the MMS for further review. (CAA, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 27 is STRICKEN; Decker's Motion to Strike 28 is MOOT. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Stipulation to Vacatur 20 (deemed a Motion to Remand) should b e GRANTED. The IBLA Decision dated January 5, 2009, should be VACATED. This matter should be REMANDED to the MMS for further review and theis case closed. Objections to F&R due by 1/11/2010. Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 12/23/2009. (NOB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
