Perez v. Allen's Siding

Petitioner: Thomas E. Perez
Respondent: Allen's Siding
Case Number: 1:2015cv00078
Filed: August 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Billings Office
County: YELLOWSTONE
Presiding Judge: Carolyn S Ostby
Presiding Judge: Susan P. Watters
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:651
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. The Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpeona Duces Tecum is MOOT and the Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. The limitations period imposed by 29 USC 658(c) is extended for seven days from 9/17/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 9/18/2015. (Copy mailed to Respondent at address given on the record.) (JDR, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Allen's Siding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas E. Perez
Represented By: Alicia Ann Werning Truman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Allen's Siding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?