United States of America et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
| United States of America, Steve Harman and Joni Harman |
| BNSF Railway Company, MONTANA RAIL LINK, INC. and John Does, 1-30 |
| 1:2017cv00059 |
| May 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| YELLOWSTONE |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the United States, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Relators Steve and Joni Harman's claims against Defendants, with each party to bear their own costs. FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 10/25/2018. (AMC)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Teresa A. Reed). Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 8/3/2018. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER VACATING THE PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER pending a ruling by the Court on the Defendant's motions 28 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , 22 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : ( Responses due by 8/21/2018., Replies due by 9/21/2018) Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 7/18/2018. (AMC)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING 36 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice- LAUREN C. BARNETT. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 7/10/2018. (AMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
