United States of America v. Seven Firearms et al
| United States of America |
| Seven Firearms and Ammunition |
| 1:2017cv00138 |
| October 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| YELLOWSTONE |
| Timothy J. Cavan |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Other |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND ORDER OF FORFEITURE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: The United States is granted a default judgment against the defendant firearms and ammunition, which are more par ticularly described as follows: Uberti Aldo Revolver, Model 1873 Cattleman, .45 Caliber, Serial No. N04495; Savage Rifle, Model Axis, 243 Caliber, Serial No. H943075; Marlin Rifle, Model 336W, 30-30 Caliber, Serial No. MR12000F; Remington Rifle, Mode l 700, 7 Caliber, Serial No. RR87888F; Mauser Rifle, Model 1891, 30-06 Caliber, Serial No. B2906; Savage Shotgun, Model 67E, 12 Caliber, Serial No. D683631; Remington Shotgun, Model 870, 20 Caliber, Serial No. RS24620U; 1,437 assorted multi caliber a mmunition; 95 assorted 20 caliber ammunition; and 82 assorted 12 caliber ammunition. The defendant firearms are hereby forfeited to the United States and shall be disposed of in accordance with the law. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/22/2018. (EMH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
