Richey v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
| Thomas Richey |
| FedEx Freight, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00021 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Timothy J Cavan |
| Susan P Watters |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Thomas Richey. (McGuinness, Michael) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF STIPULATED FACTS by Thomas Richey. (McGuinness, Michael) |
| Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Thomas Richey. (McGuinness, Michael) |
| Filing 9 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Goe, Oliver) |
Filing 8
ORDER WITHHOLDING CONSENT. Consent to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge having been either withheld or met with objection, this case remains ASSIGNED to the Honorable Susan P. Watters. The case remains REFERRED to the Honorable Timothy J. Cavan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 3/18/2021. (JDH)
|
|
Filing 7
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Statement, Joint Discovery Plan and Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 4/22/2021. A telephonic Preliminary Pretrial Conference shall be held on April 29, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan. Lead trial counsel for the respective parties are required to participate in the conference. Counsel shall use the Courts conferencing system. See order for call-in information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 3/11/2021. (HEG)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #5 Complaint with Jury Demand filed in State Court by FedEx Freight, Inc. (JEH) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT filed in State Court against FedEx Freight, Inc. filed by Thomas Richey. (JEH) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT FILE: DV-21-0086, MT 13TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY. Case Register Report. (Attachments: #1 State Court documents, #2 Receipt) (JEH) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Mailing of Consent: Magistrate as Presiding Judge. Mailed via NEF to Counsel Oliver H. Goe, Michael F. McGuinness. Consent/Objection to USMJ Form due by 3/15/2021. (NOS) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Goe, Oliver) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FedEx Freight, Inc. from MT 13th Judicial District Court, case number DV-21-86., filed by FedEx Freight, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JDH) |
| Filing fee received: $ 402, receipt number 0977-2621601 (JDH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richey v. FedEx Freight, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Richey | |
| Represented By: | Michael F. McGuinness |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FedEx Freight, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Oliver H. Goe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
