Mahan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| John Mahan |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur M Jaddou |
| 1:2024cv00140 |
| September 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Montana |
| Timothy J Cavan |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Mahan. Ur M Jaddou served on 9/27/2024, answer due 11/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certified mail receipt, #2 Supplement Online delivery confirmation) (Flann, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Mahan. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 9/25/2024, answer due 11/25/2024. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certified mail receipt, #2 Supplement Online delivery confirmation) (Flann, Christopher) |
| Filing fee received: $ 405, receipt number AMTDC-3330052 (EMH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur M Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Issued summons may be downloaded and printed by counsel for service. (EMH) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by John Mahan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Entry of appearance) (EMH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
