Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Zinke et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 26, 2018
ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs opposed Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. 2. The proposed Second Amended Complaint, lodged with the Court as Doc. 33-1, shall be filed and served forthwith. L.R. 15.1. 3. The Amended Complaint filed February 20, 2018, and Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are moot and of no further force or effect. 4. Defendants shall have to and including October 12, 2018, in which to file any and all motions with supporting briefs directed to issues presented by the Second Amende d Complaint. Briefs in support shall be in appropriate form and complete and may not incorporate by reference any statement or argument contained in any document previously filed in this case. Please review order for complete details. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/26/2018. (HEG)
|May 1, 2018
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Intervene. The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation and the InterTribal Buffalo Council are GRANTED leave to intervene in the above referenced matter. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/1/2018. (NOS)
|April 27, 2018
ORDERED: The federal defendants will file a definite declaration on or before April 27, 2018, as to whether they do or do not oppose the motion re 15 . Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/27/2018. (HEG)
|February 9, 2018
ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 2/9/2018. (HEG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?