Buck v. Colvin

Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Wanda E. Buck
Case Number: 4:2013cv00055
Filed: July 2, 2013
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CASCADE
Presiding Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Referring Judge: Keith Strong
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 23, 2014 24 Opinion or Order of the Court IT IS ORDERED that Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations are adopted. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, 1. Bucks motion for summary judgment, Doc. 11, is DENIED; 2. The Commissioners motion for summary judgment, Doc. 15, is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the defendant, the Commissioner. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/23/2014. (SLL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buck v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda E. Buck
Represented By: William O. Bronson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?